On Friday, January 21, 2011 07:43:55 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: (snip) > And as other people said – I'm afraid of systemd even more because it > was written by the same person as Pulse Audio was. PA didn't work very > well for quite a long time. I'm not going to argue about that (it's > just my personal opinion and none of you will change it), but I just > don't believe someone who wrote a piece of crap which took several > years to become generally usable will suddenly write something so > delightful so it can be used as a replacement of one of the most > tested and most established things in Unix/Linux world. > (snip) That was my point. I have had far too many negative experiences with Pulse Audio, Avahi, etc, for me to completely trust systemd when we already have something that works fine, causes next to no problems, and all for a couple of features I don't really see us needing as being part of a default system (Not everyone uses RAID/LVM/Encryption. In fact, I don't even think most Arch users use it, so I doubly see no point in this.). systemd could maybe go into [extra], but being put into [core] as a part of base, even as something running in parrallel with SysV init, I just don't get it.
