On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> ) JS is completely unstructured. powerful, but causes developers to >> implement many things that would be a part of the core syntax in other >> langs >> ) the ^^^^ causes many different impls of the same, and new devs to >> misuse the really great things about JS, like first-class closures. >> leads to absolutely obtuse and horrendous looking libraries, with >> weird semantics for its usage, like passing objects to emulate named >> arguments, and a hundred other more prudent examples. >> ) umpteen number of naunces between browsers, browser versions, and >> half-eaten standards. >> >> yes, JS has some decent libraries, and widget sets (don't say extjs). >> but pyjamas can be ran as a 100% python desktop app too. >> > > I see. One more question, what's wrong with ExtJS? It's my favorite > Javascript library of all time. --Kaiting. You reminded me of a comment on reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/cf8cv/extjs_to_add_more_confusion_to_developers_changes/c0s6tah
