Re: Replace dcron once again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 13:10, Alex Matviychuk <alexmat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For such a crucial system package it would seem wise to deal with the
> devil that's easier to understand (in theory, I don't claim to
> understand the internals of e.

That should read:

For such a crucial system package it would seem wise to deal with the
devil that's easier to understand (in theory, I don't claim to
understand the internals of either package, but if I was forced to
debug both, I imagine dcron would be easier to deal with based on
lines of code alone.)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux