On 11.11.2010 23:50, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote: >> Not only this, but also the fact that now there are 2 crons being maintained: >> fcron in community and dcron in core. Removing dcron to, say, AUR, will be a >> wiser use of devs' time... > Bottom-posting please. And I don't see a problem with the current > situation, one is in [core] the other in [community] (devs vs TUs). It > could be reverse, if that's what's meant by 'replacing'. > > As a result of this thread I've switched to fcron as well. No big deal. > > As far as I am aware, dcron is installed by default and is being advised as the main crond for Arch on the wiki. By replacing I'd mean making fcron default in wiki and install.
