Re: Replace dcron once again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/11/10 20:26, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
Thanks to this thread I decided to look at both dcron and fcron. First
google result for dcron led me to this:

(As Loui noted, many of those points are changed by the passage of seven years. Distros probably use different crons now; and fcron has improved in the meantime; and dcron might have changed, I'm not sure.)

In response to the initial concern about a bug in dcron, don't we have
anyone in our userbase that could take a look at the dcron code? As
far as updates, I wouldn't expect a basic mature package to be updated
more than once or twice a year. Update frequency alone says nothing
about the quality of the code.

I dispute that something that doesn't always schedule jobs at the frequency the user requests (this user often being root) -- and that we as a community don't even understand when/why -- is secure.

(It leaves me somewhat wondering about mature too, if no one's noticed (or fixed anyhow) this bug before. I wouldn't assume it's the only bug (although it might be).)

-Isaac


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux