On 07.11.2010 18:39, Florian Pritz wrote: > It doesn't seem like dcron is maintained very well [1], so I think we > should consider switching. FS#18681 [2] is quite a critical bug in a > crond when everyone expects jobs to run only once. > > I'd like to go with fcron because it seems to work very well for most > people, has a lot of features while having a small dependency tree. > > Comments welcome. > > [1] http://repo.or.cz/w/dcron.git > [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18681 > +1 I was bitten by that bug quite badly and it spawned 20+ backup jobs.
