Re: Python 3 Rationale?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:58:42 -0400
Max Countryman <maxc@xxxxxx> wrote:

> That is fine unless the Python development team has decide that
> python3 will not become python. 
> 
> Python 2.7.x will be maintained for quite some time. (In excess of
> four more years.) Even after it is dropped in the future there's no
> indication that the python3 binary is intended to become the python
> binary.
> 
> The link I posted earlier to the thread on the Python mailing list
> seems to indicate the opposite. 

A 'python' binary doesn't and won't ever exist, it is only a
symlink, Max.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux