But is that what Python development has decided? On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:05, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:03 AM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> i like the python2.7, python2, python3.1, python3, etc, scheme... i >> think this makes it very easy for developers to select the specific >> interpreter they need, if any. i hope this trend becomes/is defacto. >> if you are just running `python`, you should be prepared for the >> environment ambiguity it entails. > > beh, i meant to add that the `python` name should always link to the > latest release; i don't believe in catering to 'the way it is now'. > > C Anthony
