On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 03:25 +0100, Mario Figueiredo wrote: > I confess I'm baffled as to why upstream did this change, why it was > needed and if it actually was needed. > I can't seem to find anything about it in the online changelog > either. > Seems something completely arbitrary. Or an oversight. Or a mistake. I'm baffled by the fact that people make a huge issue about a comment for a possible configuration in /etc/sudoers. The change doesn't introduce anything, it just adds an example of something you could possibly implement. This is actually the same reason why I'm annoyed by bugreports that request a different order of comments or examples in the kernel26 PKGBUILD for configuration. IMHO we should just remove that completely and not care about such things, I mean... I don't add "#add --enable-xcb to enable XCB" in the cairo PKGBUILD either.
