Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux" <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
From: "Ty John (sand_man)" <ty-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:04:16 +0930
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <e02508ed273a9c010f53644a835af2be.squirrel@www.eye-of-odin.com>
Reply-to: ty-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21

> I find it interesting that upstream made a change/addition just to
> accommodate for one distribution. Usually it's the distro that patches
> things for their own benefit.
>
>

Sorry. That was me.

References:
- sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
  - From: David C. Rankin
- Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
  - From: Steven Susbauer
- Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
  - From: ty-ml

Prev by Date: Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
Next by Date: Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
Previous by thread: Re: sudoers file change - not much on dev list - reason for changes?
Next by thread: Failed to upgrade!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux