On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:09:27PM +0200, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley <toomanymirrors@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >> > >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: > >>> > >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now > >>> depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: > >>> http://dpaste.com/234866/ > >>> Jackson > >>> > >> > >> for the 999999 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to > >> update it. > >> > >> shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a > >> depends for this app > >> > > My apologies, my googling didn't turn up this prior discussion and the > > phrasing on the vala homepage (http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Release) lables > > the 0.9.x version as "releases" not a development branch. > > Jackson > > hehe, i was one of those 999999 too. and there seems to be a "secret" > versioning schema that "all" gnome projects follow: odd numbers are > unstable and even are stable. but yeah, i never found this definition > on the gnome site neither... Section 3.1 of the link below mentions it. http://developer.gnome.org/gep/gep-4.html Not the most visible location for it, but given that its organization wide, it doesn't make sense to be mentioned for each individual project either. d
