On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley <toomanymirrors@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: >>> >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now >>> depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: >>> http://dpaste.com/234866/ >>> Jackson >>> >> >> for the 999999 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to >> update it. >> >> shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a >> depends for this app >> > My apologies, my googling didn't turn up this prior discussion and the > phrasing on the vala homepage (http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Release) lables > the 0.9.x version as "releases" not a development branch. > Jackson hehe, i was one of those 999999 too. and there seems to be a "secret" versioning schema that "all" gnome projects follow: odd numbers are unstable and even are stable. but yeah, i never found this definition on the gnome site neither...
