Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:16:58 +0800 > > Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 27 June 2010 17:35, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, what? > > > we better include ppp and not wvdial? > > > > No, it will definitely help if it's included - you just have to make > > an exception and try to fit it in with the rest of the packages in > > src/core/pkg (ppp is already part of base, whereas wvdial is in > > extra). Perhaps a request to bring it into core in light of cases like > > this? > > Then probably we should move wvdial to core just like ie. pppoe stuff is > in core, no need for a special exceptions. And then we'd include it in > the package list for archiso. Having it in /src/core/pkg on the iso > will be a good sideeffect, not a primary goal. > I suggest someone who is into this stuff takes over, because I don't > really know what i'm talking about. > > Dieter Why to have a second app for dialing in core if ppp can handle already this stuff? Just my 2 cents. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.