On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ah yes, SSL! sorry :) > On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded [2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [3] saying that he was for applying the patch just to keep valgrind quiet. But openssl doesn't like to talk about that, and neither does slashdot for that matter. For a distro packager, the maximum authority regarding what to do with a given piece of software is upstream and common sense. If upstream says it's a ok, then common sense takes a backseat during technical discussions. Not to mention that initializing variables like that is undefined and bound to *always* cause confusion. Andres P [1] http://openssl.org/about [2] http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=114652287210110&w=2 [3] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=kurt@xxxxxxxxx
