Re: New Google Group for discussion and notices on Arch security.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Andres P <aepd87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those
>>> packaging.  it requires end-to-end oversight and complete
>>> configuration toward a specific and particular purpose; something that
>>> is not possible for those creating a distribution for a generic,
>>> multi-purpose user base.
>>>
>>
>> 2 words. Debian, and SSH.
>>
>
> Did you mean ssl?
>

ah yes, SSL! sorry :)

-jf


--
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."
    --Richard Stallman

"It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help."
    -- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux