On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:17, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> yeah having a quad core with 6G of ram takes care of just about any >> system performance issues > > however I was using flash 10 on a much less beefy system not so long > ago... and didn't notice issues... so I'd be curious to know how low > of a system spec do you have to go to have an issue. (it was a 1.8ghz > athlon-xp that was my previous system) I will admit, it's pretty low. My previous system was a 2GHz Athlon XP, and while Flash wasn't instant on there, and occasionally lagged, it worked. That died, and I haven't the means to replace it, so I've been using an old Dell Latitude C610 (1.2GHz P3, 256MB RAM); Flash just utterly fails on here. Well, that's not quite true; if I download a lighter game, and run it in the standalone Flash player as the only X client, it works, but that's not exactly feasible for everything. ~celti
