2010/6/15 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:51 -0500, Muhammed Uluyol wrote: >> > HTML5 only works on Chrome/IE I think. Firefox devs decided they would >> > go with the Vorbis rather than x264 codecs, while youtube decided the >> > other way round. >> Youtube uses webm now, not h.264. >> >> Firefox should have support in their nightly builds. > > Oh, my information is outdated then. When did this happen? I do recall > searching before (probably when all this html5-youtube stuff started) > and seeing clear statements that firefox would not support h.264 due to > HTML5 being an open standard or something along those lines. I think that there's a misunderstood here. Youtube is using webm in the experimental version of the site. And Firefox nightly build has support for webm, not h.264. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------
