On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Shridhar Daithankar <ghodechhap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 31 May 2010 09:03:08 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 31/05/10 13:23, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. >> >>> that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk >> >>> one. >> >> >> >> I know that, but is it worth installing ? >> > >> > Surely you can decide yourself. >> >> I heard that firefox-qt is still under heavy development and is not >> much good. I am on a slow connection, so would like a feedback if >> someone is already using it. > > I would recommend rekonq and kde webkit part. The later is in AUR. For the > former, it is available from upstream git and pretty usable as day-to-day > browser, especially when there is firefox to fallback to. > > -- > Regards > Shridhar > Nope. I have 24 addons in Firefox. Just cannot leave firefox. I loved the chrome UI, so installed chromifox extreme (with chromifox companion) which makes firefox look and behave like chrome :D Firefox QT's screenshots are impressive, worth a try. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
