On Monday 31 May 2010 09:03:08 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 31/05/10 13:23, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. > >>> that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk > >>> one. > >> > >> I know that, but is it worth installing ? > > > > Surely you can decide yourself. > > I heard that firefox-qt is still under heavy development and is not > much good. I am on a slow connection, so would like a feedback if > someone is already using it. I would recommend rekonq and kde webkit part. The later is in AUR. For the former, it is available from upstream git and pretty usable as day-to-day browser, especially when there is firefox to fallback to. -- Regards Shridhar
