2010/5/29 Alexander Lam <lambchop468@xxxxxxxxx> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/05/2010 07:17, Caleb Cushing wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Firmicus<Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Certainly this is because glib-perl needs to be recompiled with perl > >>> 5.12. > >>> Other perl packages that include binary libraries may need to be > >>> recompiled > >>> too. We need a TODO list for such perl packages... > >>> > >>> > >> > >> any package that's not arch any needs to be rebuilt. also watch for > >> actual compiling... > > > > Right, all non-any perl packages should be rebuilt. I'll send Kevin a > > preliminary TODO list for such packages in extra and community (I found > 209 > > of them... yerk! but as you say there must be many that are actually > > arch=any). Most probably we also need to rebuild all packages that use > > libperl.so. Last year the list of such pkgs was: > > > <snip> > > F > > > > Hi all, > > Did this perl rebuild get lost or something? (I currently have perl on > my IgnorePkg list because glib-perl hasn't been updated for 5.12 > yet....) > > -- > Alexander Lam > In the meantime you can rebuild glib-perl (and other libraries) yourself with ABS.
