On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/05/2010 07:17, Caleb Cushing wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Firmicus<Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> Certainly this is because glib-perl needs to be recompiled with perl >>> 5.12. >>> Other perl packages that include binary libraries may need to be >>> recompiled >>> too. We need a TODO list for such perl packages... >>> >>> >> >> any package that's not arch any needs to be rebuilt. also watch for >> actual compiling... > > Right, all non-any perl packages should be rebuilt. I'll send Kevin a > preliminary TODO list for such packages in extra and community (I found 209 > of them... yerk! but as you say there must be many that are actually > arch=any). Most probably we also need to rebuild all packages that use > libperl.so. Last year the list of such pkgs was: > <snip> > F > Hi all, Did this perl rebuild get lost or something? (I currently have perl on my IgnorePkg list because glib-perl hasn't been updated for 5.12 yet....) -- Alexander Lam
