On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila <vodoo0904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote: >>>> Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads. >>>> other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed >>>> alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one. >>> >>> +100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint >>> of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-) >> >> To be clear: >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I'm going to give this the rest of the day to simmer down, then I'm >>> going to start moderating/banning accounts >> >> Notice that "accounts" is the plural, not the singular. >> > > > Err. I don't think you should do that unless they become a pure > nuisance. I am facing a similar situation with Squidoo. Because of > someone else on my subnet (I have static ip), spamming on their site > (or may be due to a virus, its a common scene here), they have banned > the whole subnet. And now even after several request they won't > whitelist me. You may end up banning some for none of their mistake. Moderating an account merely puts emails from that account on hold until approved by a moderator.
