On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila <vodoo0904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote: >>> Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads. >>> other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed >>> alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one. >> >> +100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint >> of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-) > > To be clear: > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm going to give this the rest of the day to simmer down, then I'm >> going to start moderating/banning accounts > > Notice that "accounts" is the plural, not the singular. > Err. I don't think you should do that unless they become a pure nuisance. I am facing a similar situation with Squidoo. Because of someone else on my subnet (I have static ip), spamming on their site (or may be due to a virus, its a common scene here), they have banned the whole subnet. And now even after several request they won't whitelist me. You may end up banning some for none of their mistake. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
