On Fri 07 May 2010 10:01 -0500, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David C. Rankin < > drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 05/07/2010 09:48 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote: > > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Johannes Held <mail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> http://www.archlinux.org/news/495/ > > >> > > >> * If you have gvim installed, the update will inform you that vim > > >> conflicts with gvim. This is the expected behavior. Installation > > >> of vim and gvim separately is no longer required, the gvim > > >> package now installs vim as well. > > > > > > This is a rolling release, not an LTS. There is no excuse to not > > > be updating regularly and reading the news. If its a production > > > machine and you are worried about breakage maybe you shouldnt be > > > running arch on it. The ML, forums, and irc are full of people who > > > refuse to read the news or update regularly, and we all waste time > > > answering questions that with proper arch maintenance would ensure > > > that they never come up. > > > > It's people like you that give arch a bad reputation. Grow up. > > Saying you were wrong would be the more mature avenue. I did not bash > or call names, I stated the obvious. This is not the first time the ML > has been posted with your obvious questions. Yeah. If you notice something odd on your system please take the time to read the news before asking a question. If you have some more time maybe check the forum and wiki as well. Cheers.
