On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David C. Rankin < drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/07/2010 09:48 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote: > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Johannes Held <mail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> http://www.archlinux.org/news/495/ > >> > >> * If you have gvim installed, the update will inform you that vim > conflicts > >> with gvim. This is the expected behavior. Installation of vim and gvim > >> separately is no longer required, the gvim package now installs vim as > >> well. > >> > >> -- > >> Gruß, Johannes > >> http://hehejo.de > >> > > > > This is a rolling release, not an LTS. There is no excuse to not be > updating > > regularly and reading the news. If its a production machine and you are > > worried about breakage maybe you shouldnt be running arch on it. The ML, > > forums, and irc are full of people who refuse to read the news or update > > regularly, and we all waste time answering questions that with proper > arch > > maintenance would ensure that they never come up. > > > > It's people like you that give arch a bad reputation. Grow up. > > -- > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. > Rankin Law Firm, PLLC > 510 Ochiltree Street > Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 > Telephone: (936) 715-9333 > Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 > www.rankinlawfirm.com > Saying you were wrong would be the more mature avenue. I did not bash or call names, I stated the obvious. This is not the first time the ML has been posted with your obvious questions.
