On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 22:03 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 28/04/10 23:52, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:39 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > >> On 28/04/10 23:32, Aleksis Jauntēvs wrote: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> The idea is to implement package signing for Arch similar to rpm GPG package > > >>> signing. > > >> > > >> Good to see someone interested in this. > > > > > > Yes, the monthly forum threads were a bit tiring. > > > > > > I wonder what the need would be like for testers. And what testers would > > > actually do (try and break stuff?). > > > > The need for testers usually occurs after implementation! :) > > > Well, it does seem like a multi-part project, so I'm sure even before a > total implementation there would be bits and pieces to test > (functionality in pacman, for example, that nobody would use because the > rest of the supporting cast isn't there yet). > Hello I also like the idea of package signing for Arch. It would really be great if someone could implement this. I would also update my system to testing just because of this development, if a new pacman version containing this feature would show up.
