On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/04/10 23:52, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:39 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> On 28/04/10 23:32, Aleksis Jauntēvs wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> The idea is to implement package signing for Arch similar to rpm GPG package > >>> signing. > >> > >> Good to see someone interested in this. > > > > Yes, the monthly forum threads were a bit tiring. > > > > I wonder what the need would be like for testers. And what testers would > > actually do (try and break stuff?). > > The need for testers usually occurs after implementation! :) > Well, it does seem like a multi-part project, so I'm sure even before a total implementation there would be bits and pieces to test (functionality in pacman, for example, that nobody would use because the rest of the supporting cast isn't there yet).
