Re: Arch Linux security is still poor....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 03/16/2010 07:24 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jared Casper<jaredcasper@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan<lists@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
I don't think we need any security team for Arch. New packages are
released within a week of their updates. GPG signing and md5sum
verification is a must though.

md5sum verification has ALWAYS been done


In a security context, verification of files installed by a package
_after installation_ would be nice.  i.e. "pacman --verify
/usr/sbin/sshd" would tell me if the md5sum (or sha1sum, etc) of my
/usr/sbin/sshd matches that of the official package.

Jared


Let this thread not be just another "Will be nice" one. Pacman devs,
please start implementing these package verification things.


sudo make me a sandwich.

--
Ionut


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux