Re: Arch Linux security is still poor....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jared Casper <jaredcasper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I don't think we need any security team for Arch. New packages are
>>>> released within a week of their updates. GPG signing and md5sum
>>>> verification is a must though.
>>>
>>> md5sum verification has ALWAYS been done
>>>
>>
>> In a security context, verification of files installed by a package
>> _after installation_ would be nice.  i.e. "pacman --verify
>> /usr/sbin/sshd" would tell me if the md5sum (or sha1sum, etc) of my
>> /usr/sbin/sshd matches that of the official package.
>>
>> Jared
>>
>
> Let this thread not be just another "Will be nice" one. Pacman devs,
> please start implementing these package verification things.

Users who want these things, please start joining the pacman dev team.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux