Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 10/03/10 20:03, clemens fischer wrote: > >> Ironically, if pacman was such a tidy package manager and devs were >> so keen to keep things that way, why is there ever any output in >> "pacman -Qdt"? > > Could it be because you explicitly requested that? i.e `pacman -R > pkgname` which removes that pkg and that pkg only, see `pacman -Rh`. I always use "pacman -Rs". It's a wrapper script, I normally don't use a bare "pacman", so there's not even neglect at play. clemens
