Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
From: Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:23:03 +1000
In-reply-to: <4B94266B.8070605@konnichi.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Shredder/3.0.3

The only way for this to actually happen would be for someone to set upa git repo with a handful of packages and demonstrate that it worksbetter with the usual packaging workflow. That is what was done withSVN and why it was chosen when we switched from CVS.


Allan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: Xavier Chantry

References:
- svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: Dieter Plaetinck
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: Thomas Bächler
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: fons
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: Xavier Chantry
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: fons
- Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
  - From: Nathan Wayde

Prev by Date: Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
Next by Date: Re: New xorg-server package braks fluxbox?
Previous by thread: Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
Next by thread: Re: svn packaging, abs => git ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux