Re: A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:39:32AM +0100, vlad wrote:

> The idea of a rolling distro also applies to the AUR.
> The AUR as a part of Arch is as "rooling" as Arch is. 
> Btw, there are workarounds like "libpng12" in the AUR, if you don't want
> to rebuild all of your own built application.

Again, what I propose (not deleting the old *.so)
has nothing to do at all with being or not being
a 'rolling release'. 

And leaving the 'libpng12' in place is a much
easier solution that requiring a user to re-
install it if he doesn't want to update all
packages right now.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux