Re: A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 09/02/10 08:54, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:36:55AM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:

you are focusing only on .so which is different but this schema will
work only if the package is split in lib, -dev, whatever as now, the
headers will conflict since it have the same name on the same
location.

Not true. When a new version is installed, the
headers are replaced, and the symlink from
'libfoo.so' is modified to the new version.

In a link step you refer to the lib as '-lfoo'
which gets translated (via that symlink) into
'libfoo.so.N', the newest installed version.

If you have separate -dev and -lib packages
(and Arch hasn't AFAICS) it is the package
manager's job to always replace both in sync.
Nothing magical about that, all distros I used
before just did it that way.

I think you miss a point here. After a rebuild NONE of the packages in the repos depend on the old library. So there is no point in us packaging the old library for compatibilty, as none is needed. We only support the latest packages in the repos, so if you have issues with old versions of packages or packages from unsupported sources, then it is up to you to fix them.

Allan


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux