On 01/27/2010 08:00 AM, Thomas Jost wrote:
Le 27/01/2010 15:56, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
Thomas Jost<thomas.jost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Well, someone in this list just told me that the rules for Arch Linux are that
someone from Cdrkit would need to prove that there is no legal problem with
cdrkit.
Could we agree on a unique method for dealing with claims please?
Jörg
You said earlier that "_you_ would first need to prove that there is a
legal problem with the original software".
You are telling cdrkit is illegal.
Follow your own rule. Prove cdrkit to be illegal.
If you can't, there's no point in continuing this discussion.
Wait so if someone says that cdrtools is illegal, he has to prove that
it's not, but if someone says that cdrkit is illegal, he has to prove
that it is? Will you be my lawyer?
