Le 27/01/2010 15:56, Joerg Schilling a écrit : > Thomas Jost <thomas.jost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Le 27/01/2010 15:12, Joerg Schilling a écrit : >>> Well, it seems that you decided to use a model that is highly vulnerable for >>> FUD and you are even in conflict with your own statements: >> >> Just a (not so) funny thought about "FUD from hostile people" and stuff: >> >>> Did you remove cdrkit from Arch Linux? >> >> Did you prove it to be illegal? > > Well, someone in this list just told me that the rules for Arch Linux are that > someone from Cdrkit would need to prove that there is no legal problem with > cdrkit. > > Could we agree on a unique method for dealing with claims please? > > Jörg > You said earlier that "_you_ would first need to prove that there is a legal problem with the original software". You are telling cdrkit is illegal. Follow your own rule. Prove cdrkit to be illegal. If you can't, there's no point in continuing this discussion. -- Thomas/Schnouki
