Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
From: Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:42:35 -0800
In-reply-to: <4B279F6C.1020206@archlinux.org>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/12/15, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>  Indeed.

OK, I just fixed FS10959 and FS14083.
I hope that works.
Let me know.


-- 
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Xavier

References:
- cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Xavier
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Giovanni Scafora
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Giovanni Scafora
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Thomas Bächler
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Giovanni Scafora
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Andrea Scarpino
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Dan McGee
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Giovanni Scafora
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Andrea Scarpino
- Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
  - From: Thomas Bächler

Prev by Date: Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
Next by Date: Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
Previous by thread: Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
Next by thread: Re: cpufrequtils dead or alive ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux