Re: Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Heiko Baums wrote:

There is a second option regarding your dbus/wpa_supplicant example.
Why not file a bug report/feature request to upstream of networkmanager
to remove dbus from it? Of course you need to file this bug
report/feature request to upstream of every package which depends on
dbus. As soon as dbus is removed from every package or made optional at
runtime then you could reopen this bug report/feature request to Arch
again. Otherwise it's better to keep the optional dbus support in
wpa_supplicant.


This is a VERY good point. I shall do that.


--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux