Re: packages installed to /usr/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and x86_64-unknown-uclibc -- broken??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:10:20 and regarding:

Those packages are not essential to your system. binutils-uclibc and
cross-arm-elf-binutils are primarily developer tools.

Yes,

       I loaded them because there are a couple of apps that I want to try and cross
compile. I guess they are fine where they are, but shouldn't the install
packages have put them somewhere else?

I don't think so. It's common practice to put cross compilation tools
in non-standard places, so you don't accidentally end up compiling
something on your x86 system for an arm processor.


A while back, there was some discussion about cross-compliers and trying to be more FHS compliant. The suggestion was to put them in /usr/lib/cross-<target>. See: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cross_Compiling_Tools_Package_Guidelines_Proposal

I posted a set of PKGBUILDs for the mingw32 cross compiler.

Allan


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux