Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:23:52 +0100
> schrieb <hollunder@xxxxxx>:
> 
> > wouldn't it be two PKGBUILDs, for chromium and iron?
> 
> I would prefer Iron over Chromium, because it hasn't the Google spyware
> included. Problem with Iron is that the source code is only hosted in a
> splitted 7-Zip package on Rapidshare.
> 
> Heiko
That's not a problem. Source redistribution is allowed so we can host
the sources wherever we want.

I'm interested in a built-from-source native x86_64 iron package. The
"build" directory in the iron sources is empty though.

I didn't dig deep enough yet trying to build iron. If anyone have done this
before , please tell me how. I'm willing to maintain this in AUR If
needed.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux