Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:12:26 +0100
Andreas Radke <a.radke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:25:13 +0200
> schrieb Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and
> > the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is
> > something that cannot be forgot :)
> > 
> 
> Only 10gb? That's a bad reason. Otherwise we wouldn't have any source
> compiled OOo packages ;)
> 
> Whenever the google browser has become usable drop me a line and send
> a PKGBUILD that works well - I will have a look. With usable I mean
> a native compiling without lib32 stuff, usable plugins (at least
> flash, java, javascript-blocker and adblocker).
> 
> -Andy

wouldn't it be two PKGBUILDs, for chromium and iron?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux