Re: [arch-dev-public] Load_Cycle_Count and storage-fixup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



When I got a new laptop I investigated this problem a little and found
that with hdparm -B 254/255 the temperature went up quite
significantly. This may be a freak and I would love to know whether
there really is something behind it, but when I used -B 200 the
temperature increase was clearly smaller, but the load cycle count did
not increase!!! Is this actually at all possible? Does the -B option
do something other than only affecting head loading? Does anybody
know?

In looking through the storage-fixup package data I see that always -B
254 or -B 255 is set, so obviously there is no sign of other, possibly
more optimal values there.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux