Re: [arch-dev-public] Load_Cycle_Count and storage-fixup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>> Anyone else has some opinion about how to handle this?
>
> I'd like to affirm the opinions of Roman and Xavier and take some action on
> this.
>
> Anyone object to my putting storage-fixup in [extra] at least? If no
> objections by W 9/21, I plan to go ahead with that step. If it works out, we
> can talk about follow-up steps like:
>
> 1) moving it to [core]
> 2) integrating it into default rc.d scripts
>
> It's a pretty serious issue for laptop users with affected drives. And the
> drives are pretty popular ones, methinks.

Also note that, when raising awerness about this issue, the fixup
ussually needs to be run on resume from disk (and I think resume from
ram) too. Not only on boot.


-- 
damjan


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux