[OT] Re: Are base packages assumed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Edgar,

> Off topic: The ~2 G size of the installed packages pacman
> shows is complete size of all updated packages not the
> difference between the currently installed size and the size
> after the upgrade, right? So the complete upgrade might
> have worked for you.

Bad experiences have thaught me not to do that. It might have, though.
I didn't follow the development of pacman, so I actually don't know if
there is a sort of check on available disk space yet.

Why not implement a '--no-cache' option for pacman, to delete the
downloaded tar.gz right after the successful installation of each pkg?

Marco


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux