On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:54 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:04 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > > >> Baho Utot wrote: > >> > >>> I am following the process for the rebuild of all the package that > >>> depends on libjpeg. > >>> > >>> When rebuilding packages due to another package like libjpeg does the > >>> package release number for the dependent package get bumped? > >>> > >>> > >> If I understand you correctly, you can add a versioned dependency on the > >> updated pkgrel. > >> > >> e.g. imagemagick in [testing] has deps on lcms>=1.18-2 and libwmf>=0.2.8.4-5 > >> > >> Allan > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > For example: > > > > (from another email for libjpeg > > > > Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reply-to: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development > > <arch-dev-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development > > <arch-dev-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] WARNING: libjpeg rebuilds are entering > > [testing] - devs get building! > > ) > > > > "I just rebuilt following pkgs for testing x86_64 only: > > > > xmoto > > scribus > > kile > > kdetv > > graphicsmagick > > gimp-ufraw > > hugin > > enblend-enfuse > > kipi-plugins > > stellarium > > tuxpuck > > transcode > > fox > > centerim > > > > > > Do the packages above get the pkgrel bumped because of the change in > > libjpeg > > > > Or does the pkgrel number stay the same? > > > > > > I have a "builder script" that does an abs sync the builds only the > > packages in core/extra/local that have changed. It runs from cron on > > Sunday 1:00am. If I make a new PKGBUILD for a package I need I place it > > into "local" and the script then builds it automatically. I build the > > whole core/extra/local with optimizations for AMD k8. > > > > I then sync all my boxen from my repos. > > > > If the soname changes as in libjpeg and the packages that use libjpeg > > don't change ( the pkgrel stays the same ) then the only package that > > gets built would be libjpeg and none of the ones that depend on it. > > > > I hope that helps to explain my question. > > > > OK, the definitely the pkgrel gets changed. How else would pacman know > to update the package? > > Allan Ok, I was hoping that was the case, otherwise you folks would have busted up my script ;) My script is then go to go -- Never fear Arch Linux is here!
