Excerpts from Aaron Griffin's message of Mon Jun 22 12:27:01 -0400 2009: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Daenyth Blank<daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:47, Loui Chang<louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon 22 Jun 2009 03:09 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > >>> I will downgrade vi. If that is what the future of vi looks like, I > >>> don't want any part of it. Changes that dramatic ought to be forked. > >> > >> You were previously using vim named 'vi'. > >> The new one is actually a fork of vi called nvi. > >> > >> > > > > I don't understand why anyone would use any vi. Use vim instead... > > I've always harped on this point. I use "vim". Vim is the name of the > application that I use. Vim just happens to be largely vi compatible, > but I still use vim. Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of running "vi" and expecting vim. Sounds a bit like running "mozilla" and expecting "firefox" or... something. -AT -- Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com) Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite.
