On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Daenyth Blank<daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:47, Loui Chang<louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon 22 Jun 2009 03:09 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >>> I will downgrade vi. If that is what the future of vi looks like, I >>> don't want any part of it. Changes that dramatic ought to be forked. >> >> You were previously using vim named 'vi'. >> The new one is actually a fork of vi called nvi. >> >> > > I don't understand why anyone would use any vi. Use vim instead... I've always harped on this point. I use "vim". Vim is the name of the application that I use. Vim just happens to be largely vi compatible, but I still use vim.
