On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Daenyth Blank<daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:11, Grigorios Bouzakis<grbzks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> No i dont mean symlinking vi to vim. >> Thats not an option. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13239#comment39968 >> & downwards. >> I mean building both in the same PKGBUILD. See the CRUX Pkgfile i posted >> previously >> I think it does exactly that. >> -- >> Greg >> > > Since having vi is required by the POSIX standards, wouldn't a bundled > vi+vim make perl required? Or is it an actual optdepend for vim? (I'm > not at my home box at the moment to check) > What do the POSIX standards say, having a vi named package, or binary? I think its the second. Vim in testing has no X capabilities and only the perl interpeted enabled. Still perl is only an optional dependency. What if perl was an actual dependency. Its already in base. I dare not to imagine a system not having perl installed. Anyway i dont know if my suggestion actually works as i imagine. -- Greg
