On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis<grbzks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would be in favour of building a vim package in [core] that includes both > a vi & vim binary or you mean symlinking vi to vim... which is fine. the problem is not so much 'really vi but vim' but more that the whole package was/is (testing not included) really really screwed up. if busybox was in arch by default I'd suggest symlinking to that and let people change the symlink if they need something more powerful, esp since busybox can provide so many apps. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
