On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Thomas Bohn <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a >> smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of >> vim/gvim while vi sits in testing. > > I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Both makes it > complex. > >> Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before, Actually, I don't see a big problem with vim having provides/conflicts with vi, so that it will completely supplant it. That way we also cover the users who USE and EXPECT 'vim' but still type 'vi' (sigh)
