On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a > smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of > vim/gvim while vi sits in testing. I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Both makes it complex. > Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before, Well before was extremely ugly with this three different packages and a Vim wich didn't react like one, at least until someone found out that it needed .virc. Thomas
